Review current criteria
Check the test method, limits, test fluid and temperature, and filter configuration.
Prepare reliable test conditions together with the information needed for change control.
Review selection pointsDiscuss this applicationReview product locations and fluid paths.

Investigate failures under approved procedures. Alternative products require evidence, performance and change-control review.
A conceptual illustration created to explain equipment and application locations. It is not an actual product photograph, installation photograph or piping/wiring design.

Scroll horizontally to see the complete flow.
Concept diagram explaining a diffusive-flow test. Actual piping, test pressure, stabilization, and limits must follow the validated procedures for the filter and tester.
These conceptual views explain flow direction. Actual piping, wiring and physical flow rates require a separate design.
Define the intended use and conditions to identify the required role of each item.
Check the test method, limits, test fluid and temperature, and filter configuration.
Distinguish equipment leaks, wetting, and settings from differences in supplier documentation.
Reach a conclusion through established investigation and retest procedures and approved comparative testing.
An integrity test failure does not necessarily mean the membrane is damaged. Investigate wetting, test fluid, temperature, system leaks, and test settings. Compare alternatives based on materials, validation, and process performance as well as dimensions.
Scroll horizontally to review all columns.
| Process objective | Step to review | Selection evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrophilic membranes for liquids | Bubble point / diffusion | Complete wetting, test fluid surface tension, area, and limits |
| Hydrophobic membranes | Suitable methods such as WIT | Manufacturer-validated method, temperature, stabilization, and configuration |
| Test failures | Root-cause investigation | Leaks, valve positions, residual liquid, settings, and history |
| Alternative filters | Documentation and performance comparison | Retention, integrity, E&L, compatibility, yield, and notification of supply changes |
Compare actual operating conditions with supplier evidence and confirm the required performance and validation scope.
Follow approved failure investigation and retest procedures, retaining the initial result and the history of actions taken.
Surface tension and wetting characteristics may differ. Confirm the correlation for testing with product fluid.
Compare test certificates, materials, traceability, sterilization, retention performance, and the supplier’s change control practices.
It is an important check of the condition of the filter concerned, but it does not replace the overall aseptic process or batch quality assessment.
Process performance and validation data may differ. Comparison against predefined acceptance criteria and change control are required.
These details help narrow the configuration and the evidence to review.
Confirm model suitability and supply scope through a technical review. Use each card to make an enquiry or review official manufacturer information.

A hydrophilic PES 0.2 μm membrane cartridge described for sterilizing filtration of pharmaceutical liquids. Verify compatibility, microbial retention and integrity-test conditions for the actual process.
Enquire about this productManufacturer company information ↗An original schematic of the pressure-hold test principle. It does not show the manufacturer’s actual equipment, supplied configuration or test procedure. Confirm food-and-beverage filter/test conditions; pharmaceutical suitability and qualification require separate validation evidence.
The manufacturer presents this configuration for pressure-hold testing of sterilizing membrane filters in food and beverage production. Confirm the filter and test conditions against item-specific documentation.
Enquire about this productManufacturer company information ↗Product photographs and manufacturer images use permitted official materials and source links. Original explanatory schematics are identified separately from actual product photographs.
Compare connection, operating and documentation requirements against the current product code and reason for replacement. Separate verified matches from items needing more evidence or evaluation. Nominal volume or pore size alone does not establish equivalence.
Selection, replacement or quantity and lead-time review. Start with the information you have.
May we use Google Analytics, Google Ads and ChatGPT Ads to measure visits and completed enquiries? Learn more